What are some common objections that parties may raise during the enforcement of an out-of-state custody order?

During the enforcement of an out-of-state custody order, parties may raise various objections to contest or challenge the enforcement. Some common objections include:

1. Lack of Jurisdiction: A party may argue that the court in the new state does not have jurisdiction to enforce the out-of-state custody order. They may claim that the issuing court did not have proper jurisdiction when the original order was issued.

2. Failure to Follow Due Process: A party may allege that there were procedural irregularities or violations of due process in obtaining the original custody order. This could include issues related to service of process, notice, or other fundamental procedural requirements.

3. Substantive Defects in the Order: Parties may challenge the substance of the out-of-state custody order, claiming that it is invalid or unenforceable due to errors in the content or terms of the order.

4. Changed Circumstances: A party may argue that there have been significant changes in circumstances since the issuance of the out-of-state custody order that warrant modification or non-enforcement. This could include changes in the child's needs, living arrangements, or other relevant factors.

5. Violation of Rights: Parties may assert that enforcing the out-of-state custody order would violate their constitutional rights or rights under applicable laws. For example, they may claim that the order infringes on their parental rights or fails to consider the best interests of the child.

6. Fraud or Misrepresentation: Allegations of fraud or misrepresentation in obtaining the original custody order may also be raised as a basis for objecting to its enforcement. Parties may claim that critical information was withheld or misrepresented during the initial proceedings.

7. Emergency Situations: In cases involving emergency situations or imminent harm to the child, parties may object to the enforcement of the out-of-state custody order on the grounds of protecting the child's safety and well-being.

It's important to note that each case is unique, and specific objections may vary depending on the circumstances involved. Parties should seek legal advice to determine the most appropriate objections to raise during the enforcement proceedings.